0

It should come as no surprise to most Americans that Generation Y (those youthful bastards under 30) are figuartively and literally dying for health reform as they are the most uninsured group in the country.  (Other than minorities I would guess.)

The great researchers at Pew have come out with a new study that shows 33% of this group are not covered by any type of health insurance.  19% are not covered in my Generation (X), and baby boomers are at 12%.  Those lucky seniors who are in the Silent Generation might be the last group to enjoy Social Security and Medicare as both programs are insolvent, and are 97% insured.

Of course these Millennials are allergic to news and due to their uninformed opinion making,  they have not shown much support for health reform, on the other hand they do support Xbox and skateboarding.  The group does favor the public option, but most are realistic and don’t expect health reform to fix their situation.  If you ask a Millenial their opinion about health reform, make sure to first take out their ipod headphones so they can hear you, and then don’t be surprised when they have no idea what health reform is!

Fewer than half of the Millenials support the health reform proposal, and 36% oppose it, and the rest were busy being whippersnappers!

The rest of the study showed a lack of support for health reform from the Baby Boomers and the Medicare group, why?  Because they expect free health coverage (yes they technically paid for it) when they hit 65.  Someone needs to slap around all the demographic groups and explain the seriousness of this situation.

What is also sad, is that all the people surveryed in this study seem unwilling to change their uninformed opinion despite the changes in this fluid situation. 

I wonder if they know what is happening in California right now and that the same thing will be happening across the country quite soon.

 

Continue Reading

1

Walgreens has been changing medical practices in this country without even knowing what it was doing at first.  What am I talking about?  How about the fact that many of the 50 million or so uninsured Americans go to Walgreens Urgent Care clinics for much of their care.  This has ravaged many of the private urgent care clinics and even the primary care centers.

In an interview with Reuters (http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6185LY20100209)  Greg Wasson the CEO of Walgreens says he believes that health reform has begun in spite of the government dropping the ball.

“Regardless of what comes out, the horse is out of the barn. Reform is occurring in this country today, I’ve supported the president’s goal of health reform. I do think we need health reform in this country, but what is exciting me is what is taking place already and the opportunity we have to play a role in that,” Wasson said.

After the great swine flu pandemic so to speak of last year, Walgreens has transformed itself into a primary community health center accross the country.

Regardless of what happens with the health reform bills, Washington is going to become the primary payer for health care in this country, and more so everyday.

But if you have been to a primary care doctor or urgent care clinic, you will notice that it seems like the traffic in these offices might be cut in half.  This is a good thing, as imagine a Costco of health care taking over, a sort of medical mall at discount prices.  This is the one trick that has yet to be tried.  Further, imagine this medical mall offers a health insurance policy with access to any of the providers in the mall.

Wasson readily admits to his plans in this interview, “the states across the country are challenged. One of the things I think we can do is work with states to help reduce their cost of Medicaid. We could offer convenient, low-cost healthcare through our clinics,” he said.

They are now even offering free diabetes testing as a way of further branding these clinics.

Still while he might claim that reform is already taking place, what he is missing is that tonight, more people will go to sleep without access to basic health care then ever before, and that no matter how many free diabetes tests Walgreens gives away this ain’t changing.

Wasson has already started shaping Walgreens to begin its bid to turn its 7,160 locations into a health provider.

How that looks may vary according to the needs of the community.

For example, in some urban stores in places like Chicago that have so-called food deserts — in which fresh foods are scarce and overpriced — the company is expanding its fresh foods offerings to include fruits and vegetables even as it brings back beer and wine and continues to stock tobacco.

Continue Reading

0

Anthem Blue Cross in California is a go getter.  You have to wake up pretty early in the morning to get one over on them.  From rescinding policies to now throwing 39% rate increases at its clients, Blue Cross has cornered the market on antagonizing its clients.

What made the meanies at Blue Cross throw a 39% rate increase at their clients?  Well in light of the fact that they made close to a $3 billion dollar profit last year, it is certainly not due to cash flow issues. 

One of the largest insurers in California covering nearly 800,000 Californians, Blue Cross’s rationale here can only be speculated as trying to get one final dig at their customers before health reform passes.

Then came the news that health reform wasn’t coming, and guess what?  They still plowed forward with this.  I personally am not licensed with them, and even if I were I would not hesitate to spout angry gesticulations in their general direction.  Our health insurance brokerage is licensed however, and after reading about this increase I thought it might be good to actually price their plans to see how they compare to other California health insurance companies.

Well guess what?  They were the cheapest company in California before this rate increase, and they will stilll be among the top after it.  However, if they are profitable by such a high percentage why go after this increase? 

They might have a point with their argument about health care costs rising, and an even better point about due to the economy many of their healthy client base has cancelled coverage as they can no longer afford it, leaving Blue Cross with a pretty unhealthy client base.  Of course all carriers would also have this same condition and they did not do this.

The response from state and federal regulators was swift and heartening. California Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner, who can’t regulate rates directly but can limit insurers’ profit margins, announced that he was hiring an independent actuary to scrutinize the planned increase. The House Energy and Commerce Committee and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius also launched inquiries. To truly protect consumers, though, Congress should pass a healthcare reform bill that makes it easier for people to switch insurers without sacrificing coverage.

The company has called on Congress to start over on healthcare reform, rather than trying to improve on the bills passed by the House and Senate. In particular, Chief Executive Angela Braly of WellPoint Inc., Anthem’s parent company, recently told the Wall Street Journal that lawmakers should find more effective ways to prod healthy people to buy insurance, promote competition among healthcare providers and put the brakes on rising costs. Those are all worthy aims, and the pending healthcare bills could be improved on all three fronts.

Continue Reading

1

Cigarette Tax to Pay for State Budget Deficits – Again!

As the states become more and more like homeless vagabonds and drug addicts looking for new ways to infuse cash into their depleted coffers they are targeting another group of addicts the tobacco addicts.

They want to increase the cigarette tax another $1 which would raise $9 billion to help close budget shortfalls, and hopefully convince more people to quit smoking.  Of course if too many people quit smoking then they would lose more tax revenues.  On the other, other hand another positive thing would be that there would be less smoking medical costs if more people quit, which would then save money as well for the states which spend millions on the medical effects of smoking for those without health insurance.

Only 33 percent of voters (or smokers) think that the tax is bollucks, as in some states they are already paying nearly $10 for a pack of cigarettes.

The report details the revenue and health benefits to each state of increasing its cigarette tax by $1 per pack. If every state and Washington, D.C., did so, they would:

  • Raise $9.1 billion in new annual revenue;
  • Prevent more than 2.3 million kids from becoming smokers;
  • Prompt more than 1.2 million adult smokers to quit;
  • Prevent more than 1 million premature, smoking-caused deaths; and
  • Save $52.8 billion in health care costs.

The report, Tobacco Taxes: A Win-Win-Win for Cash-Strapped States, which is linked to above, was undertaken by a few anti smoking groups including the the Cancer Soceity and the Heart Association.

“This report shows that raising tobacco taxes is truly a win-win-win for the states. It is a budget win that will help protect vital programs like health care and education, a health win that will prevent kids from smoking and save lives, and a political win with the voters,” said Matthew L. Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.

According to the national poll released with the report:

  • By a 67 percent to 31 percent margin, voters favor a $1 per pack increase in the state tobacco tax, with 53 percent saying they “strongly” support the tobacco tax increase. This support crosses political lines, with a majority of Democrats (70 percent), Republicans (68 percent) and Independents (64 percent) favoring the increase.
  • Voters far prefer raising the state tobacco tax to other options for addressing state budget deficits. While 60 percent supported increasing the tobacco tax for this purpose, more than 70 percent opposed every other option presented, including higher state income, gasoline and sales taxes and cuts to education, health care, transportation and law enforcement programs.
  • By a margin of 59 percent to 35 percent, voters prefer a candidate for state office who supports the tobacco tax over one who opposes it. This preference is expressed by majorities of Democrats, Republicans and Independents.

“We have irrefutable evidence that raising the tobacco tax lowers smoking rates among adults and deters millions of children from picking up their first cigarette,” said John R. Seffrin, Ph.D., CEO, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. “An increase in tobacco tax rates is not only sound public health policy but a smart and predictable way to help boost the economy and generate long-term health savings for states facing deepening budget deficits.”

“When it comes to saving lives and injecting new revenue in depleted state coffers, we should not hesitate to support measures that will accomplish both,” said Nancy Brown, CEO of the American Heart Association. “Raising tobacco taxes will protect children and adults from tobacco use, reduce health care costs and revitalize critical health and education programs that too often fall victim to state budget cuts.”

“During these tough economic times, cigarette tax increases are both popular among voters and can significantly reduce long-term smoking-related health care costs,” said Charles D. Connor, American Lung Association president and CEO. “Spending some of the revenue on maintaining or increasing funding for tobacco prevention and cessation programs makes cigarette tax increases even more effective.”

The scientific evidence is clear that increasing cigarette prices is one of the most effective ways to reduce smoking, especially among youth. The report’s projections are based on research findings that every 10 percent increase in cigarette prices reduces youth smoking rates by about 6.5 percent, adult smoking rates by two percent, and total cigarette consumption by four percent.

According to the report, states can achieve even greater financial and health benefits if they also increase tax rates on other tobacco products, such as smokeless tobacco and cigars, and dedicate some of their tobacco tax revenues to fund programs to prevent kids from smoking and help smokers quit.

The current average state cigarette tax is $1.34 per pack, with rates ranging from a low of seven cents in South Carolina to a high of $3.46 in Rhode Island.

Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in the United States, killing more than 400,000 people and costing $96 billion a year in health care costs. Every day, another 1,000 kids become regular smokers—one-third of them will die prematurely as a result.

The national survey of 847 registered voters was conducted from January 20-24, 2010, by International Communications Research and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points. More information, including the full report, state-specific information and detailed poll results, can be found at www.tobaccofreekids.org/winwinwin.

Continue Reading

Doctors Are Sleepy

Published on 05 February 2010 by echealth in General Health Insurance Articles

0

I have a family member that is a surgeon, and so is his wife actually.  They are both young and both have lives that you cannot imagine.  The wife, my sister in law, is already done with her residency and fellowship and at 34 can finally relax a bit.  But they have 3 children and were working at one point 80 hours a week, my brother in law who is still a resident surgeon and about to start a fellowship  is actually still working these hours and has 3 years left of this schedule.  He has been victimized by the medical profession for nearly 10 years.

Meanwhile, people are dying everyday because of young residents who on average stay awake 30 hours during a shift and work up to 100 hours a week.  And who is working the most hours?  The newest residents who have the least experience.

Ms. Helen Haskell who lost her son to a situation like this has started a new organization called MAME (Mothers Against Medical Errors) as a way of coping with her loss and helping others avoid these volatile circumstances.

Doctors are most prone to errors from fatigue than they are inexperience, and the results can be a car crash, or a medical accident, and the personal cost can be even more savage.  Depression is a prevalent side effect in young residents, and suicide rates are frighteningly high.

MAME and other organizations have been lobbying the ACGME which sets the parameters for resident training programs, to limit the sleep deprivation schedule imposed on residents to no more than 16 hours.

Activists are urging the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), which controls medical residency training programs, to limit the amount of time residents go without sleep to 16 hours and to increase supervision of the residents. This would bring prevailing rules in line with recommendations outlined in a 2008 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on resident duty hours.

The average shift for residents is 30 hours!  The average work week is an unimaginable 90 hours.  If there were a union in this industry there would have been a revolution years ago.

The NTSB which ensures safety in transportation has named fatigue as a significant contributing factor to the crash of a commuter jet in Buffalo.  Of course in order to have any kind of perceptible change made the walking orders will probably need to come from Congress.  And they are pretty busy right now screwing up health reform.

Residents have more than suicides to worry about though, traffic accident rates are so high amongst this group that one resident puts his car into park at every traffic light to avoid falling asleep at the wheel after an average shift.

“My body is not made to work 30 hours or more,” said Dr. Dan Henderson, health justice fellow with the American Medical Student Association. “If I’m truly going to do no harm as I pledged, I need a system to protect patients against errors caused by my fatigue. If ACGME isn’t willing to do the right thing hopefully consumers and lawmakers will be ready to step in.”

Continue Reading

0

East Coast Health Insurance would like to announce that the House passed a COBRA provision extending the eligibility period for two months and extending the maximum duration of the federal assistance from nine months to 15 months.

If you would like more information on this bill you should visit our main health insurance site, or call us at 888 803 5917.  There is no obligation to buy anything, and it makes us happy to help people in these types of predicaments at no cost.   We also have a more in depth post about the ARRA bill in our health insurance advisor section.

Cobra and ARRA Premium Subsidy Extended as of December 31, 2009 for 6 months

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a provision that extends the 65 percent COBRA premium subsidy through February 28, 2010, and expands it by six months. House lawmakers also set the stage for another subsidy extension sometime in the future by making it part of the upcoming Jobs bill.

The new subsidy provision, passed December 16, was attached to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010 — a “must-pass” bill that included funding for the Defense Department. The bill now goes to the Senate. The Senate is expected to pass it before the end of the year.

Under the current law, those involuntarily losing their jobs after the end of 2009 would no longer be eligible for the subsidy.

Under the new subsidy extension provision:

  • The end date of eligibility for the ARRA subsidy changes from December 31, 2009, to February 28, 2010.
  • The ARRA premium subsidy expands to 15 months, increased from current nine months.
  • Those who have lost their subsidy by completing their nine months in November or later would be grandfathered in under the new legislation.
  • Involuntary terminations that occur on or before February 28, 2010, would be eligible for the subsidy, regardless of when the individual’s COBRA eligibility period begins. This addresses a Congressional oversight in the original bill pertaining to December 31, 2009, qualifying events.
  • Additional notices will be sent with information regarding the amendments to Assistance Eligible Individuals, as well as those experiencing a COBRA qualifying event consisting of termination of employment.

Cobra Health Insurance Extensions

Further Details of the Subsidy Extension

  • The COBRA subsidy provision requires additional notices describing the new 15-month premium subsidy. It will be sent to all assistance-eligible individuals who are on COBRA on or after November 1, 2009, or whose qualifying event is a termination of employment occurring on or after that date.
  • The provision also allows a period for the retroactive payment of premiums for assistance-eligible individuals whose subsidy period expired on November 16, 2009, and who failed to continue to pay their premiums.

The same refund/credit rules under the original ARRA bill apply to any assistance-eligible individual whose subsidy expired in November and who has since paid the full COBRA premium.

In addition, the provision addresses a Congressional oversight in the original subsidy by making eligibility for the subsidy hinge only on the involuntary termination of employment occurring on or before the new February 28, 2010, sunset date. Subsidy eligibility is no longer tied to the date the COBRA eligibility period begins. Under the original subsidy bill, anyone whose benefits terminate on December 31, 2009, would not be eligible for the COBRA premiums reduction program under ARRA because COBRA eligibility also had to occur on or before December 31, 2009. If a worker is involuntarily terminated on
December 31, 2009, COBRA eligibility would begin on January 1, 2010, making them ineligible for the subsidy.

The House Rules Committee has introduced another subsidy extension in H.R. 2847, Jobs for Main Street Act, 2010. The COBRA provision in this bill would extend the subsidy until June 30, 2010. Although the Senate will not be taking up this bill this year, it presumably will be a starting point for the Jobs bill discussions next year.

Share this Post

Continue Reading

0

I personally have been selling the Cigna individual health insurance plans for about a year as they just came out.  I had always though of Cigna as a good company who could be trusted.  I mean their rates are incredibly low firstly, and secondly they pay their brokers (like me) very low commissions.  As an honest health insurance brokerage I prefer companies that pay lower commissions as it shows that the company values their clients more than new business, or the opportunity for new business.

So when I read an article like this one, I get a little weirded out as I don’t want to be the guy that sells you the health insurance plan that kills you, literally.  If you have had an experiences like the stuff that I found on Crooks and Liars because I want to know.  The 50 clients that we have placed with Cigna this year, have been fairly happy, but again this means nothing, as all it takes is one person or one death to enlighten people.  Please let me know via our Health Insurance Contact Form or by calling 888 803 5917.

CIGNA Denies Cancer Patient Care, CEO Makes $120 Million In Five Years – Not A Coincidence

By dday Monday Sep 14, 2009 3:00pm

(I have been doing some work as a blogger fellow with Brave New Films on their Sick For Profit campaign. Visit us on Facebook.)

Today Brave New Films released their second installment in the Sick For Profit series, taking a look at the corrupt practices of CIGNA, denying care to their customers while their lead executives rake in millions and lead lavish lifestyles.

Meet Jo Joshua Godfrey. She had cancer without knowing for over a year.

“I would go to CIGNA and they would tell me I had bronchitis and give me medicine and send me home. No matter what medicine they gave me I wouldn’t get better. Then the CIGNA Director called me up and she told me that there was nothing wrong with me at all. I called the doctor, and I came with my film and my CAT scan and he just put it in, it took exactly thirty seconds. He told me, ‘You have cancer,’ and he said the reason CIGNA did not want to give you your records is they’ve known right way back for years that you have cancer and they’re not going to treat you.”

CIGNA took in $19.1 billion dollars in revenue last year, with a $292 million dollar income. That doesn’t include the salaries given to people like CEO Ed Hanway. He made a cool $12 million last year, and over the past five years he took in $120 million. Hanway has $28 million in unexcercised stock options. The company corporate jets, also not seen in profit statements, cost $68 million. This money is gained, as former communications director Wendell Potter says in this video, through denying claims and dumping the sick, enhancing the value of the company for Wall Street investors. The effect on people’s lives, meanwhile, is tragic. Nataline Sarkysian, featured in the Americans United For Change advertisement, lost her life after CIGNA repeated denied her a liver transplant, despite the family having full coverage.

Meet Stephen Coddington, the wife of Marian, a stroke victim:

The case manager at the nursing home called me in and was really upset, and she said, “CIGNA is wanting to discontinue therapy with her. The doctors called and appeals were denied.” It has been a day-in and day-out fight. Every talk that I’ve had with them, it’s been, how can we wiggle off this hook.

This is the human cost for an insurance company’s existence, for the record profits and supreme lifestyle of their executives. Welcome to the American health insurance industry. Instead of helping policyholders attain the health security they need for their families, big insurance companies get rich by denying coverage to patients. Now they’re sending lobbyists to Washington, DC to twist the arms of lawmakers to oppose reform of the status quo. Why? Because the status quo pays.

CIGNA is not a special case in the insurance industry. It’s perfectly normal and expected for a corporation to maximize profits. The difference with insurance is that the profit comes at the expense of your well-being, and frankly, all the regulations in the world won’t substantively change that. The best way to fight back is through exposure, a juxtaposition of the human luxury paid for by human misery.

So help us shine this spotlight. CIGNA’s advertising tagline is ‘A Business of Caring.’ We think they ought to come up with something more appropriate for their actual practices. If you come up with one, post it on our Facebook page. Here are some examples. We’ll send the best over to CIGNA. In addition, Jo Joshua Godfrey will join SEIU Healthcare 775NW outside the CIGNA corporate offices in Seattle, Washington today as they demand quality and affordable health care for every American as a fundamental right and not a privilege.

And send this video to your friends. Everyone needs to know what’s at stake in health care reform. This kind of denial of coverage can happen to anyone under the current system.

Share this Post

Continue Reading

0

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33441437/ns/health-health_care/

No guarantees: 3 tales of insurance disaster – Dose of reality

As the mother of a toddler who survives only because of the breathing tubes up his nose, the feeding tube in his gut, and the expertise of doctors in three cities, Courtney Elliott is keenly aware of the high costs of medical care — in every sense of the word.

Until her son, Linden, 2, was born with mitochondrial disease, a rare genetic disorder, the 28-year-old Tennessee woman had no idea that a bright, energetic child could hover constantly on the edge of death.

And she certainly didn’t know that a family with good income and excellent health insurance could be devastated by out-of-pocket medical fees that top $25,000 a year.

“We were very naïve, even dumb,” said Elliott, whose husband, Isaac, also 28, is a mechanical engineer with Bechtel Jacobs Co., a government contractor in Oak Ridge, Tenn. “I didn’t even know you had medical debt if you had insurance.”

The Elliotts are not alone. They were among more than 1,200 msnbc.com readers who shared stories of medical billing disasters in response to the site’s Dose of Reality health care series. Like much of the national debate on health reform, many stories focused on the plight of the nearly 46 million Americans who face daunting bills because they have no insurance coverage at all.

‘Why do I have to suffer financially as well?’
More surprising, however, were the tales of medical debt that came from people who said they knew that health insurance was important — and took steps to make sure they had it. For three families in particular, finding out that their medical coverage wasn’t enough, that it didn’t exist when they needed it most, or that it ended with the loss of a job was as shocking as it was shattering.

“You just want to say, ‘It’s bad enough having a kid with a horrible disease, why do I have to suffer financially as well?’” said Elliott.

That distress is shared by Michele and Kevin Thomas, Detroit-area newlyweds who lost their jobs this year to a failing regional and national economy. Michele Thomas had health coverage through her job at a furniture store until she was laid off in April. She was searching for a policy she could afford on her unemployment compensation when she developed a severe gall bladder infection and needed emergency surgery. Now the pair, still searching for work, face $15,000 in bills they can’t pay.

Those worries are echoed by Duane Thayer, a 51-year-old Colorado man who fell off a ladder putting up Christmas lights last year and nearly severed his left foot. He thought he had coverage for nearly $500,000 in medical bills, but he says the insurance company denied his claims, in part for a single late payment and in part because they said the surgery he’d had for a club foot as a child counted as a “pre-existing condition.”

Most coverage comes from jobs
About 159 million people in the United States got their health insurance last year through employer-sponsored health insurance, according to the latest data from the Kaiser Family Foundation. Another 14 million people bought insurance through private plans. Most of the rest who have insurance are covered by the government through Medicaid or Medicare.

For most customers, that system works just fine. But for some, simply having health insurance is no guarantee they can pay for health care, noted Len Nichols, a health economist at the nonpartisan New America Foundation. He’s a vocal advocate for insurance reforms now being crafted in Congress, so long as they make U.S. health care cheaper, more accessible and higher quality than it is now.

In part, the push for health reform is aimed at fixing a health insurance system that can financially ruin Americans who face sudden illness or injury. In 2007, nearly two-thirds of all bankruptcies in the U.S. were tied to medical debt, and nearly 80 percent of those who filed for protection were insured at onset of illness, according to a June study in the American Journal of Medicine.

“Basically, no one’s coverage is secure,” said Nichols. “A large number of people have not had a disaster in the health care system, so they don’t know how bad it is. It could happen to any of us at any time.”

For three families who responded to msnbc.com, it already has. Here are their confirmed tales of medical billing disaster.

Sick child ravages family finances
Before their second child was born, Courtney and Isaac Elliott shunned most things medical and didn’t understand why anyone wouldn’t. They had a healthy little girl, Aniyah, now 5, and good insurance provided by Aetna through Isaac’s job.

“I ate all organic and I never took any medicine and I had a medication-free birth,” said Courtney Elliott, who goes by the nickname “Courey.” “I had my baby at home.”

Linden arrived on Dec. 15, 2006, a dark-haired, dark-eyed baby who within days revealed severe problems. He had trouble breathing and needed surgery to correct a malformed larynx.

He couldn’t swallow well, and breast milk wound up in his lungs instead of his stomach. Within weeks, he needed to be fed solely through a tube. Other puzzling problems emerged as well: He couldn’t regulate his body temperature, he had trouble with motor skills, his bowels didn’t work right.

Results of a muscle biopsy confirmed his parents’ worst fears: Linden had mitochondrial disease, a rare genetic disorder that often leads to severe disability — and death.

“He could live 10 years or he could live 10 days,” Elliott said of Linden’s prognosis.

The disease results from the failure of the mitochondria, the part of human cells responsible for processing oxygen and energy.

It’s a devastating medical diagnosis that conjures for parents an endless cycle of care. And it’s a devastating financial diagnosis as well.

“It’s not possible, emotionally or financially, to prepare to have a child as ill as Linden,” said Linden’s specialist, Dr. Mary Kay Koenig, assistant professor of pediatric neurology at the University of Texas Medical School at Houston.

The family must travel from Tennessee to Texas at their own expense three or four times a year to see Koenig, one of the nation’s few specialists in mitochondrial disease.

At first, the family thought the medical expenses would be no problem. Isaac Elliott earns $72,000 a year at Bechtel Jacobs and his generous insurance covers 100 percent of services after initial co-payments.

But like many families coping with chronic illness, the Elliotts were surprised to learn that the co-pays for Linden’s condition would be extensive, unrelenting  — and a constant financial drain.

“Each time he has a tube change, it’s $150. Each hospital visit is $250. Each emergency room visit is $100. Each surgical procedure is $100,” Elliott said. “In the past 30 days, we’ve had two ER visits, a hospital stay, his prescriptions.”

The Elliotts spend at least $2,000 a month on out-of-pocket costs for Linden’s care, and often more. That leaves little for anything but the most basic family expenses — and sometimes not even those.

“I didn’t pay my electric bill this month and I didn’t pay my gas bill this month,” admits Elliott, who must stay home to take care of Linden. “We live paycheck to paycheck.”

They’ve managed to buy a tidy house in a vine-covered east Tennessee neighborhood thanks to a no-down-payment loan, but their furniture is well-worn and sparse. They rarely eat out, except when they’re in the hospital, and they confine family outings to free trips to playgrounds or parks.

There are times, Elliott adds, when she can’t afford all of Linden’s medications, even with generous help from relatives.

“There’s no worse feeling than having to weigh your child’s needs vs. what you can afford,” she said.

Still, Linden is hardly the sum of his symptoms. The sturdy, 34-pound toddler has a quick smile and verbal skills that test at a 4-year-old’s level.  His vocabulary includes words like “duodenum,” and he proudly shows off his stuffed ape, Chunky Monkey, who also sports a hospital bracelet and a tube in his tummy.

When he gets a little wild, Linden will hitch a ride on his IV stand, scooting with one foot, then rolling down a hospital hallway.

When the deep dimples fade, however, there are often flashes of pain. Linden tires quickly, retreating to the comfort of a pacifier and his mother’s arms.

“Owie!” the toddler cries as a nurse tests his blood to prepare for surgery. “I don’t like pokes!”

An operation on Oct. 12 was aimed at installing a port in Linden’s shoulder to allow fast regulation of his blood sugar. Without it, his glucose level has been vacillating wildly, creating constant risk of coma — or death.

Elliott says she never knows whether to expect a normal day or an emergency. Some children with mitochondrial disease have lived to adulthood, but others die very young.

“I think it’s very difficult for me as a mom to know that there’s nothing I can do,” she said. “I can try my best and he still might die. That is just an incredibly powerless feeling.”

On top of all that worry is the crushing financial burden.

“That’s the kicker,” she said. “You got the crappy end of the lottery and you got a medically fragile child and you’ll have to fight for his life. And now, we’re going to drain you financially, too.”

Health reform could ease the Elliott’s financial worries, if not the medical concerns, said Nichols, the health economist. The proposals under consideration mandating that virtually everyone purchase health insurance could boost the pool of potential payers and allow new limits on out-of-pocket costs.

For the Elliotts, such limits could be far lower than the $25,000 or more a year they now pay.

“You could afford that because you could get everybody in the pool,” Nichols said. “To make the pool reflect the whole population, it’ll be, on average, cheaper.”

Any change would be welcome, said Elliott, who supports a government-funded public health insurance option.

“If my husband were to lose his job, we’d be broke in a week,” she said, adding later: “So few people understand they could be next.”

Lost job, lost insurance
In the spring, as unemployment rates in the Detroit region topped 22 percent, triple the national rate, 38-year-old Michele Thomas became one of the casualties of a spiraling economy. She was laid off from her job at a furniture store in April, four months after her husband, Kevin Thomas, 43, left his job as an apartment security worker after an intruder threatened him with a gun.

Kevin Thomas had health insurance through a $400-a-month private policy. Michele had good coverage through her work, but that ended when she lost her job. Living only on her unemployment payments of $774 every two weeks, she was still searching for an affordable policy in August, when the pain in her stomach started.

For several days, Thomas tried to ignore the symptoms, but when she started vomiting blood at 1 a.m., her husband insisted on taking her to an emergency room.

“I said, ‘Honey, I don’t have insurance. We can’t go to the ER,’” Thomas said.

When she got there, doctors quickly determined she had a gallstone the size of a golf ball and needed emergency surgery, plus two days’ recovery.

“When we heard ‘surgery,’ we were really panicking,” she said.

Thomas came through the operation well, but with a $19,000 hospital bill to show for it. Even with the hospital’s no-insurance discount of $7,500, the bill topped $12,000. And when Thomas got home, she found $3,000 in past medical bills that should have been covered by her previous employer — and weren’t.

Now the couple, married less than a year and still out of work, face $15,000 in bills they can’t pay. It likely will scuttle their plans for a down payment on a house and will force them to postpone having children, even as their biological clocks tick louder.

“Every day, we look in the mail and think, please, please, don’t let this get any higher,” she said.

Thomas hadn’t thought much about health reform before this situation, but now it seems clear that the system has to change.

“I’m hoping that Washington and Congress are listening to individuals, actually listening to the common man,” she said.

Nichols said reform proposals now in Congress could offer hope to the Thomases and others.

“In the new world, if you lost your job, you would be able to go into the health insurance exchange, and because your income is dropped, you would be eligible for subsidies,” he said.

Although the health reform bills being considered each include some form of an insurance exchange, wary insurers are waiting for the details that could spark fierce opposition.

“It’s not over, friend,” said Nichols, who expects a tough fight to continue. “This is going to be Armageddon.”

Thomas said she’ll pay more attention to explanations of the exchange and other proposals because the consequences of the current system are devastating.

“I don’t think anyone should go broke or bankrupt paying for the medical care they need,” she said.

Catastrophic injury, coverage denied
Duane Thayer of Highlands Park, Colo., learned the hard way that a single misstep — both physically and financially — can quickly lead to medical disaster.

For years, Thayer, 51, took his Christmas cue from actor Chevy Chase, stringing at least 10,000 festive lights. That’s what he was doing last Nov. 8 when the ladder slipped, sending the information services director plummeting to the ground. As he fell, his left foot caught in the ladder, nearly amputating the limb.

“All the bones had severed and all the skin was gone,” said Thayer. “They tried to put it back together, but it fell apart.”

The damage required five surgeries and nearly a month in the hospital. Through it all, Thayer assumed he was covered through an $843-a-month COBRA health insurance policy that he kept after being laid off from a technology job in late 2007.

Although he got another job, working for the Visiting Nurse Association in Denver, Thayer turned down that insurance in favor of the more expensive COBRA policy because he thought the coverage was better.

In February, after four months of covered care for his extensive injuries, Thayer was notified by his insurance provider that they were revoking nearly $300,000 paid toward medical bills that eventually totaled about $500,000.

When Thayer called for an explanation, he said he was told that his policy was being canceled retroactively to October because of nonpayment — and because he’d had surgery to repair a club foot problem as a child.

“She said it was a pre-existing condition,” he said.

Thayer’s bank records show that he missed a payment in October but later made that payment and subsequent payments after his injury. Records show that Ceridian, the COBRA administrator, debited his bank account — and then returned the funds, after his injury.

Thayer acknowledged the missed payment; he said he had to bail his 19-year-old son out of a sudden financial mess. But he said he quickly made up for the lapse and continued to try to pay the premiums after his injury, especially since his medical bills appeared to be covered.

“I was a few weeks late with ONE payment after timely payments for over a year — not to mention having paid every month for 30 years to other insurance companies — and they kill my coverage,” Thayer said. “This is so wrong. My mistake was to have my accident.”

Three insurance entities were involved in Thayer’s medical coverage: TSYS, the former employer that extended COBRA coverage; Ceridian, the administrator that coordinated payment; and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia, the insurance company that provided it.

Representatives for all three companies said that Thayer’s missed payment automatically invalidated his policy starting in October 2008 — and that he was notified of the termination.

But none could explain why his bills continued to be paid for four more months. And none could say why Thayer would have been told his coverage had been denied because of a pre-existing condition.

But Thayer insists he knows what he heard.

“They are absolutely saying that I am lying. And why would I do this? What gain would there be for me to do this?” he said. “Personally, this never made sense, not even for insurance companies. How possibly could they hold me to a congential condition that occurred literally 45 years ago?”

Thayer’s situation is not unique, said William Shernoff, a consumer rights lawyer in Claremont, Calif., who has written several books about insurance payment problems. Under federal COBRA law, insurance coverage may be terminated after a late payment, but it’s not required to be. Often insurers will continue to accept late payments and extend coverage — until a large claim is filed.

“Once somebody has had an expensive procedure, most carriers do go back to find any loopholes to get out of paying, that’s very common,” Shernoff said.

Health reform proposals now being considered in Congress may prevent insurers from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions, like Thayer’s childhood surgery. But Shernoff said scrutinizing late payments and other loopholes may get even worse.

“They’re not going take less profit,” Shernoff said. “If you shut one door, they open another. There will be more exclusions, more deductibles, more co-pays.”

That’s not encouraging to Thayer, who fears that a year after nearly losing his foot, the monetary fallout may turn out to be truly crippling.

“Right now the emotion that best applies is abject fear and worrry,” Thayer said. “I am terribly concerned about all the collection calls I am receiving, worried about holding onto my home and finding a way not to file for medical bankruptcy, fearful that if my appeal is not successful, what will happen to my family financially.”

Thayer, who follows politics closely, said he’s been disappointed so far in both parties’ handling of the health care overhaul.

“The irony is that I never expected to have a front-row seat in the health care reform debate,”  he said.

Share this Post

Continue Reading

0

Here is yet another health discount company that is being busted.  The local, state, and federal governments are not doing a thing to stop this and what is so annoying is that they could very easily stop this nonsense.  Any new health insurance company should have to pass a rigorous inspection and should not be allowed to sell health insurance or discount plans until they pass a simple test.  Two times a year the states should run a premium vs. complaints ratio test to see if the company is still in compliance with some kind of minimal standard.

These companies themselves are to me the worst kind of fraud. Worse then Madoff.  What is so ridiculous is that this is people’s lives they are playing with.  Of all the businesses to go into this is without doubt the most insane.

If you are reading this and suspect you have a discount plan please call me @ 888 803 5917 or fill out our health insurance complaint form so that I can report on it to other consumers and stop them from suffering from the same situation.   Additionally, I can file a complaint on your behalf with the state of Florida or wherever you  live and get your money back.   Help save someone from these companies.

If you are a currently a member of United American, Mega, Midwest National, Cinergy, ALR, or anyother health insurance plan that is suspect now is the time to cancel.

Mary Lloyd’s husband was lying in the intensive care unit of an Arizona hospital when she got a good look at their new health insurance card for the first time.

Then she got the shock of her life. The card read: “This is NOT an insurance card.”

For the retired couple from East Bethel, it was the beginning of a financial nightmare that left them with at least $50,000 in unpaid medical bills. They discovered that the new “health plan,” they signed up for in January, for $499 a month, wouldn’t pay for any of his medical care.

“I was royally duped,” said Mary Lloyd, a painful admission from a woman who spent 27 years as a clinic and hospital manager. “I understand health care, and I understand health insurance,” she said. “That’s why I was so mortified that this happened to us.”

No one knows how many customers have fallen into this trap. But dubious health plans are “spreading like poison oak all over the country,” says James Quiggle of the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, a nonprofit watchdog in Washington, D.C.

Consumer advocates say companies are taking advantage of the recession and the growing number of uninsured people — 1 in 5 American adults under age 65 — to sell “health coverage” that evaporates when customers try to use it, or provides far less than promised.

Just last month, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson sued two out-of-state companies for allegedly misleading customers with phony claims about their health plans; and ten more investigations are underway, she said.

“Here, they’re targeting people who are pretty sophisticated, and who really asked all the right questions,” Swanson said. People believe them, she said, because they’re “so desperate to find affordable coverage.”

Share this Post

Continue Reading

0

Guess it is two in one day. Now it is being reported that underweight premies are being denied health insurance.  Of course the publicity comes and

Embattled health insurance companies are taking a page from Goldlilocks. Last week, a 4-month-old child was denied insurance for being too heavy (the company has since changed its mind). Now the Web is buzzing about a toddler who was denied coverage for being too small.

On Wednesday morning, “The Today Show” covered the story of 2-year-old Aislin Bates. Though she weighs just 22 pounds (in the third percentile range for kids her age), her doctor has described her as being perfectly healthy, never having been sick with anything more than a cold. Still, United HealthCare didn’t buy it, saying that the child didn’t meet height and weight standards. So, no insurance for Aislin.

The story has inspired a slew of searches. After the segment aired on NBC, queries on young Aislin surged from zilch into triple digits. United HealthCare is wisely responding to what could be a PR crisis. In an article from Denver’s ABC affiliate, a company spokesperson for United HealthCare said the company’s height and weight requirements “are based on several medical sources, including the Centers for Disease Control, and are well within industry standards.”

Still, Aislin’s case, as well as the previous incident of the obese 4-month-old, have highlighted the difficulties some parents face when trying to get coverage for their children. Aislin’s father Rob was quoted as saying that even though he doesn’t support universal health care, this battle over insuring his daughter has made him want insurance companies to have more “legitimate reasons for denying coverage.”

NBC medical expert Dr. Nancy Snyderman, who appeared with the Bates family, was more pointed in her criticism: “This is just so bogus. A pre-existing condition for a child this age is birth, let’s be real….. This is why things have to change.”

Below, you can watch Aislin and her family on “The Today Show”(after a 15-second ad)…

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews-hl951

—————————————————

If the link doesn’t come up just google. This is what goes on all the time. One is too big-one is too small? When will people wake up to what’s going on in America? The insurance companies didn’t want the public to know about this, or any of the other thousands of claims they deny on a daily basis.
Because these children were the age of 4 and 2 it’s being pushed through the news, and the company only changed their ‘mind’ after this one went public in a BIG way.

United Healthcare
is no different from any other big insurance company.
They all have someone who sits behind a desk, decides who should be covered, who shouldn’t be and the end result is generally death for those who get a stamp that reads, “DENIED.”

Continue Reading